GregLab | Exam Prep

Describe Azure architecture and services

Azure Identity, Access, and Security

Core

Separate directory, authentication, authorization, access policy, security strategy, layers, and posture protection.

Aligned to the AZ-900 skills measured as of July 20, 2026; product behavior verified August 23, 2026.

Why this matters

Identity and security terms overlap in everyday language. AZ-900 expects the exact purpose boundary: who a principal is, how sign-in is verified, what actions are allowed, and which broader controls reduce risk.

Must Know

  • Microsoft Entra ID is Azure’s cloud identity and access service. Microsoft Entra Domain Services provides managed domain features such as domain join, Group Policy, LDAP, and Kerberos/NTLM without customer-managed domain controllers.
  • SSO reduces repeated sign-ins across integrated applications; MFA requires more than one factor; passwordless methods authenticate without a traditional password.
  • Microsoft Entra External ID supports identities outside the workforce tenant, such as partner collaboration and customer identities. External identity does not by itself grant resource authorization.
  • Conditional Access uses signals such as user, device, location, application, and risk to make if-then access decisions and can require controls such as MFA.
  • Azure RBAC authorizes actions on Azure resources by combining security principals, role definitions, and scopes.
  • Zero Trust is a strategy built on verify explicitly, use least privilege, and assume breach. Defense in depth uses multiple security layers so one failed control is not the only protection.
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides cloud security posture management and workload protection across supported Azure, hybrid, and multicloud resources.

Compare and Distinguish

  • Authentication vs authorization: prove identity versus decide allowed actions.
  • Entra ID vs Azure RBAC: supply identities and authentication versus authorize Azure-resource actions.
  • SSO vs MFA vs passwordless: reuse a sign-in, verify with multiple factors, and sign in without a traditional password.
  • Conditional Access vs MFA vs Zero Trust: signal-driven policy, a possible authentication grant control, and the broader strategy.
  • Azure Policy vs RBAC: resource compliance versus user/action authorization.
  • Zero Trust vs defense in depth: guiding strategy versus layered protection model.
  • Defender for Cloud vs Azure Monitor: security posture/workload protection versus general telemetry and observability.

Scenario examples

  • A legacy app needs managed domain join, so the team evaluates Entra Domain Services.
  • A sign-in from a risky context must require MFA, so Conditional Access evaluates signals and applies the grant control.
  • A user needs read access to one resource group, so Azure RBAC supplies authorization at that scope.
  • A security team needs posture recommendations and workload protection across clouds, so it evaluates Defender for Cloud.

Exam traps

  • SSO is not MFA, and MFA is not authorization.
  • Conditional Access is not a replacement name for Zero Trust.
  • An external identity still requires appropriate authorization.
  • Defender for Cloud is not the same service as Azure Monitor or Service Health.

Key takeaways

  • Identity, authentication, and authorization are separate layers.
  • Use RBAC for Azure-resource permissions and Conditional Access for signal-driven sign-in decisions.
  • Zero Trust guides decisions; defense in depth layers controls; Defender for Cloud assesses and protects cloud workloads.

Ready for the quiz?

  • How do Entra ID and Entra Domain Services differ?
  • What separates Conditional Access from MFA?
  • Which service authorizes Azure resource actions?
  • How do Zero Trust and defense in depth differ?

Related objectives

  • D2.4.S1 — Describe directory services in Azure, including Microsoft Entra ID and Microsoft Entra Domain Services
  • D2.4.S2 — Describe authentication methods in Azure, including single sign-on (SSO), multifactor authentication (MFA), and passwordless
  • D2.4.S3 — Describe external identities in Azure
  • D2.4.S4 — Describe Microsoft Entra Conditional Access
  • D2.4.S5 — Describe Azure role-based access control (RBAC)
  • D2.4.S6 — Describe the concept of Zero Trust
  • D2.4.S7 — Describe the purpose of the defense-in-depth model
  • D2.4.S8 — Describe the purpose of Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Learn more

Free Microsoft Certified: Azure Fundamentals prep

Build focused AZ-900 quizzes from skill areas, topics, and product references.

Practice with exam-style multiple-choice and multiple-response questions, score breakdowns, explanations, and a compact reference for this lane's official exam domains.

Read Topics Build a quiz

Exam Weights

Exam snapshot

AZ-900 at a glance

Level
Beginner / Fundamentals
Duration
45 minutes
Questions
No fixed live question count published
Formats
No guaranteed question-type mix
Scoring
Scaled score; 700 minimum passing score

Quiz builder

Choose your practice set

Mode

Exam fidelity: Microsoft does not publish a fixed live question count or guarantee a question-type mix for AZ-900. This lane contains only multiple-choice and multiple-response exam-style practice; no supplemental matching, ordering, or case-study exercises were needed. Practice percentages do not reproduce Microsoft's scaled scoring, and difficulty labels describe this site's Fundamentals-level scenario complexity rather than a Microsoft-published question rating.

Reference

AZ-900 topics and reference map

Study links

AZ-900 resources